请帮忙用英语翻译一段话 十分感激

We are member of higher education said by here privatization as we are unable to privatization completely generally in enterprise's said by economic field middle, higher education said by us privatization to be not that proprietary right is complete referring to universities and colleges established by the government change, change into private universities and colleges , be to point to higher education come from the process that the private resource part expands unceasingly in funds but mainly. Lead to international higher education privatization direct cause being on the rise be, the lot of world country government has reduced higher education funds , this feasible institution of higher learning can not hold together development of oneself coming the allocation of funds resembling the gold period that postwar higher education develops again being dependent on the government like that in Aussie, secondary be hit by among the 70's to the 80's, institution of higher learning funds has secretly schemed against with invariable Australia Dollar in the situation being at a standstill , higher education funds has taken up the proportion go down that the government always expends 35%, higher education funds is 30% if equal funds secretly schemes against with full-time student life, have come down. Support having also reduced the country in Japan , the government to higher education, government's support has accounted for 80% of general income institution of higher learning for the first time in the 70's , only arrive at has been to account for 66% only among the 80's , has come down 14 percentage point. That governments of all countries in the world compresses higher education funds is to lead to from various factor. First, be hit by later stage on the 70's, the Western countries has broken out commonly economic crisis, for example world number one economy powerful country USA has been in l974 and has broken out in 1975 postwar the gravest economic crisis, under here heavy blow, inflation rate is in postwar have reached 12% such dibit figure first, the economic situation takes a turn for the better to some extent in 1979, but a good time never lasts long, the gross national product growth rate starts a steady decline , 1986 annual budgetary deficits rise by hundred million U. S. dollar to 2207 , this feasible Fed cuts down higher education funds in large amount starting from 1985. Secondly, arrive at medium term in the 70's, the pressure requiring that the government provides more higher education location already slows down, higher education turns into masses education already from outstanding person education, this feasible government is in the cards cutting down higher education funds but not running very big political risks, on government problem such as environment , the sources of energy , aging of population and hygiene policy may funds be rotated being used for the public paying close attention to especially, third, begin to shake happened in the government and the public to the institution of higher learning confidence. ,Institution of higher learning and economic connections are not close , the what be cultivated people can not adapt to need of modern times economy society and fierce international economic competition need varying from minute to minute. Expenses compressing a public welfare finally, as far as possible, this is higher education's right away privatization have established keynote

We the higher education privatization which said in here with us enterprise's privatization which said in the economic domain is usually different, we said higher education's privatization is not refers to the public colleges and universities property rights to change completely, transforms into the privately established colleges and universities, but is mainly refers to the higher education funds the process which expands unceasingly from the private resources part. causes the immediate cause which the international higher education privatization emerges is, the world many National governments reduced the higher education funds, this have enabled the College to look like the postwar higher education development the gold time such dependence government's allocation to maintain own development again .
In Australia, from the 70s to the 80s, the College funds was in the condition which by the invariable Australian Dollar computation bogged down, the higher education funds accounts for the government gross charge the proportion to drop 35%, if lived the even funds computation by the full-time student, the higher education funds dropped 30%. In Japan, the government also reduced the country to higher education's support, in the early 70s government's support accounted for the College gross income 80%, but only accounted for 66% to the 80s, dropped 14 percentage points. Various countries' government cuts the higher education funds is breeds by many kinds of factors. First, in the 70s mid and late part, the Western country erupted the economic crisis generally, for example the world top-quality economical powerful nation US and in 1975 erupted postwar most in l974 the serious economic crisis, under this serious attack, the inflation rate in postwar has achieved 12% such two-position digit for the first time, in 1979 the financial circumstance had the change for the better, but good times don'ted last long, from 1985, the gross national product rate of increment starts to drop continually,
in 1986 the financial deficit rose to 2207 hundred million US dollars, this caused the Federal state to cut the higher education funds massively. Next, to the mid-70s, the request government provided the more higher education positions the pressure already to slow down, the higher education has educated from the outstanding person transfers the popular education, this enabled the government to have the possibility to reduce the higher education funds not to take the very big political risk, the government to be possible to divert the funds the environment which, the energy, the aging of populations even more paid attention in the public and protects to live questions and so on policy, third, the government and the public started to College's confidence to have the vacillation. , the College and the economical relation is not close, raises the human cannot adapt the fast changing modern age after the Jinan society to need with the intense international economy competition need. Finally, the compression social welfare expenditure, this has established the main key as far as possible for higher education's privatization .
就是这

We are here talking about the privatization of higher education with us in the economic field is usually mentioned in the privatization of enterprises is different, we are talking about the privatization of higher education do not mean a complete change in ownership of public institutions, into a private hospital School, and mainly refers to the funding of higher education resources from the private part of the growing process.
International higher education led to the rise of the privatization of the direct reason is that many countries in the world of the reduction in government funding for higher education,
As a result, colleges and universities can no longer as the post-war development of higher education as a golden age of reliance on government funding to maintain its own development
In Australia, from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, higher education funding in order to calculate the Australian dollar in the same state of stagnation, total government expenditure on higher education expenditures declined by 35%, if full-time students are Health Financial terms, expenditure on higher education decreased by 30%. In Japan, government tightening the state's higher education support in the early 1970s to support the Government's colleges and universities accounted for 80% of total revenue, but the mid-1980s, while only 66 percent, fell by 14 percentage points. Governments reduce funding for higher education is caused by a combination of factors. First of all, in the mid-and late 1970s, the western world economic crisis broke out, for example, the world's number one economic power in the United States in l974 and 1975 after the war broke out in the most
Serious economic crisis in this heavy blow, in the post-war inflation rate reached 12% for the first time such a double-digit, in 1979 the economic situation has improved, but not last, in 1985, the gross national product Growth rate began to decline, the deficit in 1986 rose to 220,700,000,000 U.S. dollars, making the federal government cut funding for higher education. Second, to the mid-1970s, asked for more pressure on the location of higher education have been reduced, and higher education from elite education to mass education, making government has the potential to reduce funding for higher education and not take a lot of political risk Government funds could be diverted to the public more concerned about the environment, energy, the aging of the population and Wei
Health policy on issues such as Third, the government and the public's confidence in colleges and universities began to shake. , And colleges and universities do not close economic ties, the culture of modern people can not adapt to rapidly changing as
Social and economic needs of fierce international economic competition. Finally, as far as possible
To reduce social welfare expenditure, which for the privatization of higher education to establish the tone

Here we said we usually privatisation and higher education in the economic field in the privatization of the enterprise, we say the privatisation of higher education institutions is totally changed public ownership, and private institutions of higher education funds refers primarily from private resources in the process of growing part.
In international education is the direct rise privatization, many countries in the world government tightening higher education funds,
This makes higher school can't like postwar period of the development of higher education of gold on government funding as to sustain its own development
In Australia, in the 1970s to from 1980s, the higher school funds to $unchanged in stagnant condition of calculation, the higher the proportion of appreciation of government funds declined to 35%, if China full-time education funds, while funds declined by 30%. In Japan, the government also tightening state of higher education, the early 70s government support for the support of higher school, but to 80% of the total in the 1980s only 14, 66%. Governments in higher education funds is compressed into by many factors. First, in the late 1970s, universal erupted in western countries, such as the world's top economic crisis and the economic powers in 1975 l974 American postwar most erupted
Severe economic crisis, in this heavy blow, for the first time in postwar inflation reached 12% of the double digits in 1979, the economic conditions improved, but short-lived, from 1985, GDP growth began declining, 1986 deficit 2207 rose to $billion, which makes the federal government of higher education funds slashing. Secondly, to the mid 1970s, requires the government to provide more position of higher education, and higher education has slowed pressure from elite education to public education, which makes the government has higher education funds may reduce the risk but not a political risk, the government can be used for public funds to pay more attention to the environment, energy, ageing and health
Birth policy issues, and the third, government and the public confidence began to higher school wavered. Higher school, with no close economic ties and cultivate people cannot adapt to changing modern
Keats social needs and fierce competition in the international economy. Finally, as far as possible
And social welfare spending, which is of higher education in the privatization established tone