The film on the biggest controversy here, according to the conjecture playwright, Jane is the last retreat so that she could not and wife together, and lead to lifelong Weijia, then why an advocate emancipated, the woman seeking love in the last minute Give up their love and choose "safe" and "responsibility"? » It is precisely this issue so that many people are not satisfied with explanations so that they find the "right decision" on the Jane who is inappropriate. Since no one knows the facts, it is entirely possible is the first time by breaking up after Tom, Jane disheartened, first love this heartbreaking end. However, if the man is really so selfish and hurt her, "Daxixiansheng" will be so perfect, so good? » At least as readers, we have this "Darcy" The prototype is full of disappointment. Therefore, the writers were not in the responsibility to the Tom possession, but Jane's own personality and ideas and then the environment of this tragedy. Although she does not see Tom in the final to become judges, Gong Ming achievements (based on historical records) does not regret it, but at that time, Jane's personality, she made this decision is reasonable.
In my opinion, Jane impact this decision has made the following points: First of all, she is Tom's of no confidence, even if he is a lawyer, Jane still doubt his uncle left the funding, Tom is able to bear all the financial burden, in particular also Including her sister's support. This is in the eyes of some incredible modern man, after all, the modern woman can marry if the lawyers, that means enough to live comfortably by. But in that era, inherit the family property and the annual fixed income is the sole judge of the rich and the poor standard, not a monk in the family property attachment phase of the lawyers, in particular, are notorious Merry, including Jane, all that can not marry She can solve the financial problems.
At the same time, she does not trust Tom in "difficult life" if the situation can not persist in this love regret it. Because he had "retreat" that women are very sensitive, Jane Austen is no exception. Men to women disappointed once, often will lose her unconditional trust.
I think that at this time, there are she functioning of the feminist ideology, feminists advocating the point is that love of a woman is not the most important things, the pursuit of personal and career, his family can be an important than love. Jane is not unwilling to fight for love and adventure, but she eloped to know the consequences of happiness does not necessarily mean the beginning of her well-being by far more than the definition of love as simple as that. Such a choice, that love is not she think the most important thing, not only between their two things. Families, relatives and responsibility in her heart still occupies a higher position. But she believed that, no love, can also create their own meaningful life, therefore, on the contrary, as a lot of love for all the women, Jane Austen chose to use their writing to complete the meaning of life, rather than put aside everything for the love eloped . It seems to me that this is a typical feminist expression.
The film audiences experience the best hope is that one could not get a perfect outcome, but let her write the story to have all of the beautiful fairy-tale ending, this, Jane Austin showed a lot of courage, a I believe the courage to love. Although she has not been a happy, but the pursuit of happiness and hope to bring the courage of the generations readers, and this is the great Jane Austin.
At the end of the arrangement is very good, Jane Austin again in front of Tom Lefroy read, like when they first met, but this time, she read the "Pride and Prejudice"…….
Although she did not like "Elizabeth Bennet" with the same wife Xiangshou life, but I choose to believe that her "Mr. Darcy" is the same perfect.
请参考。