On the situation change in contract law principles of the legal effect
Contract Law
The principle of non change in contract law on the meaning, is to avoid the execution of the contract due to changes in cases of unfair results. Once that is applicable to produce legal effects, but also will have an impact on rights and obligations of parties to the contract of the results. In particular, the application of the principle of non change the legal effect primarily reflected in the following two aspects:
(A) rescission
Change the fact that cases arise, if the affected party through the exercise of the right to change the contract, is still not sufficient to rule out changes to its own violations of the unfair state, you can further exercise of contract interpretation, fundamentally eliminate the loss of balance Contractual relationship. Generally speaking, the changes to the contract because of violations can not be achieved purpose of the occasion, or contract to become an occasion looked forward to, or loss of the contract significance of the occasion, General can dissolve or terminate the contract.
Such as employment, leasing, lending and continue to contract because of violations that change in the termination of the contract. Also, a party of the sub-payments for long-term benefits, and the other for non-payment, while a rescission.
However, it is noteworthy that in the cases affected by changes to the party through the exercise of Jiechu Quan and rescission, the other party will often cause the loss, the loss of whether there should be advocated by the party to the adverse effects of compensation, the mainland Law of the national laws are not made expressly provided. This is generally in accordance with the change in contract law on the rescission of the contract or liability of the general provisions to be addressed. Chinese academics believe that violations changes to one of the parties under the contract Jiechu Quan only by the judicial organs of the trial practice before confirmation. However, China's Contract Law provides for the change or rescission, should bear the liability issues. For the parties to exercise this power because of rescission, to the other party caused the loss of property, contract law should also be based on the relevant provisions to address. Based on China's "Contract Law" section 97 "after the lifting of the contract were not met, and terminate; has been performed, according to circumstances and the nature of the contract, the parties can request restitution and take other remedial measures, and the right to seek compensation for losses" The provisions, it can be concluded: in China even in cases where affected by changes to the party through the exercise of Jiechu Quan and rescission, on which the other party to the losses caused, in accordance with the law still should bear the liability.
(B) the contract change
Change the contract is to maintain the original contract, the contract is only the content changes, so that in a fair contract on the basis of specific performance. Specifically, the main way to change the contract as follows:
First, change the subject matter. Based on principles of contract law of the type of debt is a sure delivery to the subject matter, in principle, the debtor can change. However, cases of changes which a party can not deliver the subject of the contract, the debtor should be allowed to change to the same kinds of other objects instead of the original subject matter. However, if the cause can not be certain of delivery, not because of specific alternative of the other, in such circumstances it is not appropriate to change the subject matter of the way.
Second, the amount of change in the subject. In double in the contract for both sides there is a relationship between the price, but there are some which the ratio between. If the proportion of cases lead to great changes disorders, should be subject to increase or decrease the amount, so that the two sides have taken place in the implementation of change, so that balance the interests of both sides. In the use of this method must pay attention to changes in the limits of the problem, to determine a reasonable standard to accurately assess the value ratio between the two sides to remove Xianshigongping phenomenon. In determining reasonable standards, consideration should be given the contract the parties must assume the risk of transactions, such as the risk of currency depreciation.
Third, postponed or phased implementation. This situation is actually referring to the period of change, mainly applicable to the contract dates, changes have taken place in cases of obstruction to the contract as scheduled, the parties hope to continue to fulfil contractual obligations, but through changes to achieve the purpose of the contract period to avoid Fair result. Therefore, the negative impact of one of the parties that extension or phased implementation.
Fourth, the first to refuse to perform. This mainly refers to one of the parties have the obligation to perform the contract, while in the discharge of arrival, the other party to change because of violations led to significantly reduce property, credit or other crisis situations, difficult to treat payments, not the other party in the Regular treatment can be provided to carry out a security, can refuse to perform the contract. However, a party must have for each other difficult to treat cases of changes in the implementation of the exact evidence, it should bear the losses caused by this responsibility.
To investigate the cases of change due to changes caused by the contract issue, the parties must explore the object of the exercise of the right to change the problem. It should be said that cases of change circumstances, one of the parties to the contract changes to the exercise of the right target is the terms of the contract. On the scope of the terms of the contract, all countries in the world of law not the same. Such as Hungary, the former Yugoslav countries such as the Civil Code stipulates that violations by the change of one of the parties have the right to change the terms, it could be any of the provisions in the contract.
Fifth, change the subject matter. Based on principles of contract law of the type of debt is a sure delivery to the subject matter, in principle, the debtor can change. However, cases of changes which a party can not deliver the subject of the contract, the debtor should be allowed to change to the same kinds of other objects instead of the original subject matter. However, if the cause can not be certain of delivery, not because of specific alternative of the other, in such circumstances it is not appropriate to change the subject matter of the way. Countries such as Greece and the Civil Code stipulates that violations by the change of one of the parties have the right to change the terms of the contract only in terms of the number of 327-328.
Third, the subject of change. Based on principles of contract law of the type of debt is a sure delivery to the subject matter, the debtor can change in principle. However, cases of changes which a party can not deliver the subject of the contract, the debtor should be allowed to change to the same kinds of other objects instead of the original subject matter. However, if the cause can not be certain of delivery, not because of specific alternative of the other, in such circumstances it is not appropriate to change the subject matter of the way. The author believes that cases of change from the principle of the spirit, by the parties to change the terms of the contract should be present in the cases of those who have changed the role, if the discharge will continue to be adversely affected party Xianshigongping, However, after the changes but also to avoid the terms. Therefore, from the fact that state, is within the scope of such a clause is not limited to the number of terms in the contract, but only some of these provisions, but is by no means any of the provisions. As mentioned above, change the principle of non change the validity of the contract performance in the above four aspects, and these changes to the way contracts have been fully described in cases where a party changes can change the terms of the contract is limited to the amount, duration , To form and subject, and other provisions, and also to change the subject of the contract will be limited to the subject by the same type of alternative. Because of these provisions of the change, effective from the adverse effects of changes to a party because of violations Xianshigongping change the role of the contract.
non execution obligations under the contract either fully or in part
全部或部分合同项下的未能履行的合约（债务）
内容全部来源于网络收集，如有侵权，请联系网站删除：QQ：24596024