求大神将图片上的文字转换成word格式在线等

我QQ290173469

2025-03-26 02:30:44

推荐回答（6个）

回答1：

帮你转了，可惜分辨率太低，将就用：
可以尝试：OnlineOCR、NewOCR、Free OCR这些网站在线识别
下面是用Free OCR帮你识别的结果
' ' I "' \’_S/ '|\l
- _ “ ABIIIE GRIFTIN mo totm rt. tratrsatt
4 v '
[-2- The use of exemplars rather than labels is an attempt by the product-development
G mm» maintain as close a link as possible to the actual words by customers. For
§_= artample, one might label a group of statements about computer viewing devices as “ap-
' ‘ popriate ergonomics." but this may be misleading tithe customer really said “everything
‘ is blurred aher a day using my computer." The "blurred-vision" statement provides the
t team with more realistic clues about pmdllﬂ ﬂit "ilk" "K Wliliuli
label does not.
11reData
h The groupconsensus chart for portable food-carrying devices was constructed by a
team of engineering manlumr chosen from M.l.T.'s Management of Technology Pro-
grant/l'heteam hadstudiedtheproduct category. had read all ofthc interview transcripts.
and had reviewed the list of customer needs. The team was lead by Abbie Griffin. who
had observed and/or participated in almost 20 industry applications of group-consensus
charts at that time. Sixty M.l.T. graduate students who use food-canying devices panic-
ipated in the customer sort. Because we funded this data collection ourselves. we reP°f\
the actual customer needs.
In addition we compared group-consensus charts and customer-sort hierarchies for 8
major consumer good with almost 200 customer needs Two g'0up-C0ltS¢l'tSttS charts
were developed: one by a team at the consumer-products company who had worked on
the product category. and mother by a team olgraduate students from M.l.T.‘s engineering
school. The customer-sort hierarchy was based on a sample of 60 consumers chosen
randomly from active users of the product category. Because the data are proprietary,
we report summary statistics and our qualitative impressions only.
Finally. wereportonacomputer-product application in wltichateam-based consensus
chart was compared to a customer-based consensus chart. and we report the qualitative
elperienoe of approximately 20 proprietary applications of the customer-sort
methodology.
I-‘and-mn;viug Deviev Structures
Table I compares the top levels of the group-consensus chart and customer-sort hier-
archies for food-mnying devices (The complete hierarchies are available in Grithn l989.l
‘ Consider ﬁrst the number of secondary and tertiary needs and the number oi‘ exemplars
It within each primary grouping. The customer-sort technique provides a more even dis-
‘¥‘ ._ uibution. While an even distribution rs no guarantee that a hierarchy is better. an even
'_ distribution is one of the desirable features for which product-development teams look.
‘r
5 ; mite t
_1f;‘ anuaﬂndmru-eunuvmumdamommtnltfual-Canttng-Derieemggplrtgg.
.‘ 3:1‘ .AF!’ll~ll'lY‘GMRT '3 A,
if .9. I suns nuns exettmtns nmmvilio ‘ . .
.-'. .74" by 1, 4 ° 1 4 Z " _ . - ‘
1_.- oz tr z 3. _' .- 1"';" -- ., t A,
a .. -t 1» -o ~ a u» ~
u 6 ; N’. .. I x-;.‘t< ,
2| _' " 5 I39 at ago = gf; xi
‘ 1 "*.=s-‘ 112- ‘ "=' cl-' at - -
I, ‘_’_’.V V‘; l»~.‘ ._ ‘ jag.
1.. . -’ ; .‘ -> ._