傲慢与偏见的读后感

2024-12-26 10:38:27
推荐回答(2个)
回答1:

  这是一个发生在英国乡村的美丽故事,贝纳特家的五个女儿待字闺中,两位贵族先生的出现,民兵团的到来,给他们原本平静的田园生活带来了一些不平凡的意义。
  小说开头那句“每一个有钱的单身汉,都得娶一位太太,这就像一条举世公认的真理。”已经是脍炙人口的名句了。接下来的故事自然是围绕一系列绅士淑女之间的爱情和婚姻所展开的。在小说中,伊丽莎白和达西的爱情与婚姻是全文的主线。而伊丽莎白的几个姐妹和 女友的婚事,都是用来与女主人公理想的婚姻相对照的。
  如夏洛特和柯林斯尽管婚后过着舒适的物质生活,但他们之间没有爱情,这种婚姻实际上是掩盖在华丽外衣下的社会悲剧。在文中柯林斯曾很明确地说过自己结婚的三个理由。“我结婚有这样几个理由:第一,我觉得只要是像我这样生活宽裕的牧师都应当为牧区居民在婚姻方面带头起一个模范作用;第二,我坚信婚姻会大大地促进我的幸福;第三,可能这一点我应当早一点提出来,这也恰恰是我有幸称为恩主的那位贵夫人曾再三建议和嘱咐我要办的事。”这三个看似冠冕堂皇的理由,怎么听着都让人觉得相当的虚无飘渺。结婚对于柯林斯来说仿佛更多的是为了别人而结,自己却从中鲜有收获,这是一种无爱的婚姻。卢卡斯小姐之所以答应他,完全是考虑到了财产,至于多快可以得到那些财产,她倒无所谓。对于受过教育可是没有多少财产的夏洛特来讲,结婚是唯一的一条体面的出路,虽然可能不见得能使人得到幸福,但毕竟是避免贫穷的最可靠的保险箱。
  而莉迪亚和威克汉姆的婚姻无疑就是《傲慢与偏见》中最荒诞且最不被看好的婚姻了。作者甚至没有正面交代二人是如何走到一起,继而出走的。只是简单的通过简和加丁纳舅妈写给伊丽莎白的信,让读者了解情况的大概。两个人之间很难说有什么爱情,即使勉强有,也只能算是“肉欲之爱”产生的盲目激情。这桩完全由肉欲和金钱操控的婚姻注定是失败的。 作者在最后一章含蓄得指出:“威克姆不久便清淡爱情,莉迪亚对他稍许持久一些。”
  感动之余,细细品味,总觉得在伊丽莎白和达西的爱情上有些过于理想化。男主角俊美高大,家财万贯,拥有皇家般的庄园。女主角美丽动人,聪慧机敏。一个王子,一个公主。两人似乎都不需要为生活作过多的奔波,可以想象他们婚后的生活将如人间仙境般惬意安稳。我不知道这是不是也有那个时代的因素在里面,亦或是作品对其省略以突出人物情感的发展。但不管怎样,还是让我有一种抓不住、摸不着的虚幻感,可能是文章过于美好了吧,可能这里饱含了作者太多太多的希望与寄托。
  有人说,“艺术源于生活,而高于生活” 。也有人说,“艺术的虚构往往使之比现实来的更为纯粹”。这让我想到了近期热映的电影《成为简•奥斯汀》,该影片讲述了小说作者简•奥斯汀的一生。而《傲慢与偏见》的创作灵感就是源于作者的亲身经历,只是现实没有像小说中写的那样皆大欢喜,作者只能在自己的小说里完成那未完成的梦想。我想,这也是我取这个题目的原因吧,伊丽莎白和达西复杂而又纯真的情感真的让人不得不发出“此情只应天上有”的感慨!原本的一对冤家对头,到头来竟如此情投意合,是天意?是人为?我们不得而知,但真的要感谢作者将如此精彩的一部作品奉献给我们,感动了一代又一代的读者。在书中,在不断翻拍的电影里,我们每个人都能看到自己的影子,看到人物细腻的内心独白,看到爱情的伟大。

  满意采纳哦亲~O(∩_∩)O

回答2:

“Any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen”, when this words about Jane Austen given by Mark Twin first came upon to me, I was, just in your expectation, a little bit surprised. Gradually, however, when I know more about the characteristics of her works, I think the judgement of Mark Twin makes sense in some degree. Especially after I have finished her work Pride and Prejudice and compared it with the contemporary production The Red and the Black written by Stendhal. Less reflection and exposure on social conflicts among different classes is a big pity for Austen’s works, as well as for the readers. Still, however, Austen’s unique interpretation towards marriage is the distinguished feature of her literary accomplishment. And I want to give some reflection on the different kinds of relationships and marriages in Pride and Prejudice.

Five different types of relationships or marriages, as far as I am concerned, are presented in this book.

The first type, undoubtedly, is the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley. They met at a party and almost fell in love with each other just after their first encounter. Bingley’s wealth and courtesy, Jane’s beauty and tenderness, and the similarities in their personality are all the factors that contribute to the relationship. So, though I believe, actually, there is some kind of love between the young lady and the gentleman, it is not the pure and true love, their combination is not for no intention but for some certain desire. So I would like to call their relationship as “Secular Love”.

Contrasting to the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley, the marriage between Charlotte and Mr.Collins is much less romantic, or no romance at all. One is the Cinderella in reality equipped with no prince, the other is a priest, old and ugly. Their marriage, of course, has no love but compromise. Even Elizabeth thinks “Charlotte the wife of Mr. Collins, was a most humiliating picture!” But what could she do? Just as she said, she is not romantic and she asks only a comfortable home, and this is within Mr. Collins ability. Comparing with being a 27-year-old burden to her family,at least for her, marrying Mr. Collins is the best choice. So as for them, I call “Rational Love” or rather------ “Rational Combination”.

Another couple is Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Bennet. Just in the first chapter, I wondered why two people with such different characteristics could live together for 23 years. The wonder disappeared when the explanation was offered by Austen in Chapter 42 about Mr. Bennet’s attitude towards his wife. Captivated by youth and beauty, he married her and very early in their marriage, after knowing the disposition of her, ended his affection and used her ignorance to contribute his amusement, having impropriety of his behavior as a husband. Neither for Mr. Bennet nor for Mrs. Bennet this marriage is quite fair or contented, but both of them should pay, and had already paid the bill of their “Hasty Love”.

Lydia’s relationship with Wickham, to some extent, is similar with her parents’. Mr. Bennet was captivated by the beauty of his wife and Lydia was fascinated by the handsome appearance of Wickham. Compared with her parents’ marriage, however, Lydia’s relationship with Wickham would only turn out a much more unpleasant one, for their marriage is based on the fulfillment of vanity and the desire of property. So I consider their relationship as “Orectic Incorporation”

And finally here comes the relationship between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. When I first finished the movie of Pride and Prejudice, I still wondered why there is a love flame between them. One is so proud and the other full of prejudice, but when I read more details about this work, the answer has emerged. “Love”, a word we are so familiar with, but what is love? In Austen’s work, I gradually know that love is not just as abstract as we often regard. Take Elizabeth, for example, her love for Daisy is based on two things: respect and gratitude. She respects his valuable qualities: nobility and kindness, and even Wickham had done something so bad to him and his sister, he still didn’t blame him before others or let him lose all dignity in public. Also, she is grateful to Mr. Darcy, for his love, for his forgiveness about her bad manners when she rejected him, for his help to her sister’s marriage and her family’s fame. And finally, these turned out her attachment, affection and love for him. As for Darcy, his attention to Elizabeth was first on her eyes, full of liveliness, thoughts and pursuits and unlike any other ladies, she is such a unique girl that she didn’t flatter him at all, so for him she is so extraordinary and attractive. And Elizabeth got his respect and love because of her own independence, liveliness and uniqueness. And I regard their relationship as “Spirit Love”.

Austen’s attitude towards marriage, love, status and property can still be used as a reference. Nowadays, fast food culture derives fast-food-style love, although we are in the era of fast changes, it’s better for us to love rationally and independently. Hope everyone has his real, unique love.