傲慢与偏见读后感

[傲慢与偏见读后感]It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.In Pride and Prejudice, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of money determines everything is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything一眨眼，三十几章已经过去了，人物的性格也很明显地被作者刻画出来了，傲慢与偏见读后感，读后感《傲慢与偏见读后感》。这本书中似乎只有两种人：聪明的和愚蠢的，没有绝对的好坏之分，骗子韦翰也许除外。他利用了自己巧妙的奉承能力以及一付讨人喜欢的仪表，迷住了伊丽莎白，不停地为自己洗刷冤情，中伤达西。可笑他的话里充满破绽，而聪明过人的伊丽莎白虽能与彬格来小姐辩驳，与咖苔琳夫人顶撞，却还是被韦翰牵着鼻子走。说实话，我并不认为伊丽莎白被骗说明他是一个愚人。人，总是先入为主，达西先生傲慢、无礼的样子早已进入伊丽莎白的头脑，还怎么对他产生好感？对于旁人的点评又怎能轻易的置若罔闻？对达西产生偏见是很正常的。我说的旁人自然就是指相貌堂堂的韦翰了。不可否认，韦翰长着一张英俊的脸，表面上也装得非常绅士。虽有人不可貌相、知人知面不知心之说可就连我这个活在二十一世纪，以旁观者的身份看这个故事，仍然对韦翰产生好感，又岂能怨伊丽莎白这一个生活在过去时代的姑娘？ 合上这本书，仔细地品味一番，方才发现，整部小说，之所以吸引人，完全是因为它轻松幽默的格调。伊丽莎白的嘲笑讽刺，正将那些自视绅士、淑女的贵族的本来面目暴露无疑。而伊丽莎白的父亲班纳特先生竟然以嘲笑太太、女儿为家庭快乐，幸哉？不幸哉？　 奥斯汀《傲慢与偏见》的正如她自己所说，是在两寸象牙上细细的雕刻，它是奥斯汀的代表作。这部反映婚姻问题的小说是作者作品中最受欢迎的一部，也是她本人最喜欢的作品。作品生动的反映了18世纪末到19世纪初处于保守和闭塞状态下的英国乡镇生活和世态人情。其社会风情化似的小说不仅在当时吸引着广大的读者，时至今日，仍给读者以独特的艺术享受。她是第一个现实地描绘日常平凡生活的小说家，在英国小说史上起了承上启下的作用。 整部作品没有滂沱的气势，没有曲折跌宕的情节，但就是这种简单，至今深深地吸引着我们。奥斯汀短暂的一生几乎都是在英国的乡间度过的，也许就是周围朴素，宁静的氛围孕育了她淡然的气质。并不能因为没有丰富的经历，就对她的对于事物的分析能力有所怀疑，读过《傲慢与偏见》的人一定会为她细腻、敏锐的情感所折服。在写《傲慢与偏见》时，她只是一个十几岁的女孩，难道这不是一种天赋吗？她的确很少接触外界，但思想存在，想象存在，这一切的存在就足够。　　〔傲慢与偏见读后感〕随文赠言：【这世上的一切都借希望而完成，农夫不会剥下一粒玉米，如果他不曾希望它长成种粒；单身汉不会娶妻，如果他不曾希望有孩子；商人也不会去工作，如果他不曾希望因此而有收益。】