Once practicing the limit is to attach with at a kind of special crime appearance in the common crime process, mean"implementation made to carry out a certain outrun joint use commit crime intentional criminal offence", but other common crime persons vs the behavior's nonexistent and subjective fault, hence lead limit behavioral pertaining to crime responsibility from carry out the behavioral of the person undertake alone.The quantity makes to then point "use official quantity as a crime since hence a kind of crime type of standard or the quantity Xing factor".For under the quantity accomplice of once practiced a limit, because the quantity makes oneself of the special make its crime intentionally also exist special and make to affirm that the type of judicatory that once practiced limit to become pertaining to crime practices a medium difficulty question thus.
This text in addition to preface outside is divided into five fractions, add up to 20030 words:
The first part is the illustrative case. First points out in turn six illustrative cases, then explained that each case difference as well as regarding illustrative case in accused person whether to constitute implements has limited the existence the dispute focal point.
The third part is the amount accomplice practices the judicature which limits to recognize. By to amount accomplice under and certainly must exist implements has limited definitely is the logical foundation, to the amount accomplice to knew that the content not explicit several kind of crimes carry on the analysis intentionally, summarizes the amount accomplice to implement has limited may divide into the heterogeneity to implement has limited, the homogeneous archery target to implement has limited as well as the connection .
The fourth part is the amount accomplice implements has limited the legal responsibility undertaking. First principle which is proud according to the criminal law in responsibility for an offense, the theory which analyzed has limited the behavior the legal responsibility to by implement the accomplice person who this behavior undertakes alone, then take this as the foundation, implemented according to the amount accomplice in has limited the type the difference, has been clear about limiting and other accomplice person, in different implemented has limited under the type to undertake what kind of legal responsibility.
我靠,这么多啊,这翻译费老大劲了。你还是用网上翻译自己慢慢翻译吧。
Of limit is collateral at joint crime in the process of a special kind of crime pattern, it is to point to "make some of the implementation of deliberate crime than common crime", and other common criminal behavior does not exist to the subjective fault, so a limit the criminal responsibility of behavior by the implementation of the behavior of the single person to assume. The amount is refers to "make in legal amount as crime accomplishment standard or sentencing factors of a crime type". For the amount of accomplice of limited, due to the particularity of the amount committed itself has made their deliberate crime, so that there are also special that this kind of limit become the criminal judicial practice of difficulty.
This paper is divided into five citations in addition to outside, a total of 20030 words: part
The first part is the typical case. First will 6 ?
汗。。。