[Summary] the people check pertaining to crime in the Cha hospital to discuss again an anti- to tell is people check Cha the hospital implement litigation direct a working talent of important way and path.This text tries an existent problem to carry on analysis, study from 3 to the our country current pertaining to crime discuss again an anti- to tell a work and try to put forward an opinion:The first, for breach the situation of the litigation procedure of law provision, what circumstance under bring up to discuss again an anti- to tell, should make concrete analysis, not all bring up to discuss again an anti- to tell.The upper grade people check a Cha hospital to justify towards descending the verdict that the class court of the people has already taken place legal effect and, if apply law to lack basis, if discover to affirm fact proof insufficiency, or apply law to lack basis, perhaps measure Xing obviously out of character, or breach the litigation procedure of law provision, should according to judgment direct procedure to put forward an anti- with class court of the people to tell;The second, the people check a Cha hospital to put forward the case that the pertaining to crime anti- tell according to the judgment direct procedure, can from accept an anti- to tell of take up with class court of the people, court of the people shouldn't the instruction discuss again;The third, the law should discuss again an anti- to tell term to make a provision to the pertaining to crime, better way of doing takes a year as proper.Perfect the people check pertaining to crime in the Cha hospital to discuss again an anti- to tell system, then can better maintenance judicatory of fair, accused person and the legal rights of victim.
[Keyword]
The pertaining to crime anti- tells to discuss again an anti- to tell an anti- to tell origin of matter instruction to discuss again an anti- to tell time limit
[Summary] the people check pertaining to crime in the Cha hospital to discuss again an anti- to tell is people check Cha the hospital implement litigation direct a working talent of important way and path.This text tries an existent problem to carry on analysis, study from 3 to the our country current pertaining to crime discuss again an anti- to tell a work and try to put forward an opinion:The first, for breach the situation of the litigation procedure of law provision, what circumstance under bring up to discuss again an anti- to tell, should make concrete analysis, not all bring up to discuss again an anti- to tell.The upper grade people check a Cha hospital to justify towards descending the verdict that the class court of the people has already taken place legal effect and, if apply law to lack basis, if discover to affirm fact proof insufficiency, or apply law to lack basis, perhaps measure Xing obviously out of character, or breach the litigation procedure of law provision, should according to judgment direct procedure to put forward an anti- with class court of the people to tell;The second, the people check a Cha hospital to put forward the case that the pertaining to crime anti- tell according to the judgment direct procedure, can from accept an anti- to tell of take up with class court of the people, court of the people shouldn't the instruction discuss again;The third, the law should discuss again an anti- to tell term to make a provision to the pertaining to crime, better way of doing takes a year as proper.Perfect the people check pertaining to crime in the Cha hospital to discuss again an anti- to tell system, then can better maintenance judicatory of fair, accused person and the legal rights of victim.
[Keyword]
The pertaining to crime anti- tells to discuss again an anti- to tell an anti- to tell origin of matter instruction to discuss again an anti- to tell time limit
this is the best answer!
内容全部来源于网络收集，如有侵权，请联系网站删除：QQ：24596024